Tuesday, June 23, 2009
LET US EVALUATE HOW MEDIA PORTRAYS ........
Muslims are Fundamentalist, Extremist and Terrorist! What do you think…? Let's read some news… Killing own children and wife ![]()
So what do NON-Muslims Do???
![]()
This is media depiction of events. They never write Christian/Jews/ Buddhist/Hindus/ Atheist/Parsis etc... killed his daughter/son etc… Only they write and mention if he is Muslim. This make you think of Muslim an Extremist and Fundamentalist. Let's find some more crimes… Incest Crimes By Muslims
By Non-Muslim
Hmm….Now What about Terrorism….following are muslims
Then who the following are???
These are NON-Muslims. Are NOT they Terrorist??? ???????? Killer always belongs to some religion or faith. Only mention when he is Muslim. One might say… But Muslims are suicide bombers ….they are real terrorist Let's have a look at the following…
Above are Muslim Then who are the following??? ?
These are Hindus and Bhudhist… Policy recurs by the media… See some Statics CHICAGO PROJECT ON SUICIDE TERRORISM
79% are Communist and Christians suicide bombers. 21% Islamist.
Both Charts show that secular suicide bombers are more than religious. Here's another view.
Tamil has no comparison, 100% SECULAR PKK 100% SECULAR. Lebanese 71% SECULAR; 29% (Relegious) Not only Muslims but also Christians. Palestine about 60% RELEGIOUS (SURELY MUSLIMS) AlQaeda 100% Religious (Off course Muslims) BUT WHY MORE MUSLIMS IN PALESTINE ARE SUICIDE BOMBER?????? ????????? ????????? LET'S SEE IS THIS BECAUSE THEY ARE IN STATE OF WAR AGAINST ISRAEL ?????
THESE ARE PALESTINIANS WITH IN PALESTINE (HOME). See brutal statics of Palestinians fatalities…
WHAT WILL YOU DO IF THIS ALL HAPPENS TO YOU? One might say… they can call USA for help instead of suicide attacks or stoning tanks. HERE IS USA ROLL IN THIS WAR…
Wednesday, June 17, 2009
By Yvonne Ridley (0) commentsDEMOCRACY is a wonderful thing ... as long as the results put the right people in power. And so when Iranian leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was swept back into power a great many people across the world began to question the result. He's certainly popular with millions of voters across Iran but despised by the corporate Western media. Despite my efforts, I could not find one single mainstream newspaper which covered the Iranian elections in an objective way. Exactly the same thing happened when the Palestinians swept Hamas to power - in its arrogance the Western media decided if it wasn't 'best for the west' then it can’t be good for anyone else. The journalists are often mere accomplices or tools for darker forces. And so if a democratic election produces the ‘wrong’ result the CIA, among other mischief makers, go into overdrive to create unrest. And if this is the case, they’ve done a good job - hundreds of thousands of people are demonstrating in Tehran as I write. Sounds fanciful? Well former US President Bill Clinton "formally apologized on behalf of the United States” for what he termed “American crimes against Iran.” Clinton relayed the story at the World Economic Forum in Davos in the March of 2005 admitting that in the 1950s the United States deployed the CIA to depose Mossadegh, who was an elected parliamentary democrat. Once he was out of the way the US brought back the Shah, a more compliant, agreeable leader who would do what he was told. (His equally compliant, but deluded, son is briefing those in Washington at the moment). And just to make sure the brutal Shah remained on the Peacock Throne, the CIA helped train the secret police to teach them effective ways of supressing the people through murder and torture. The trouble is today’s mainstream media is not prepare d to delve far enough in history and it seems there are those suffering from political amnesia, unwilling to check or remind their interviewees of that dreadful period when thousands upon thousands of innocent Iranians were slaughtered under the Shah’s regime. To some journalists, it seems inconceivable the so-called hardline President had been re-elected. But perhaps that’s because most of the Iranians the Western journalists interview are privileged, english-speaking intellectuals who despise Ahmadinejad’s brash, combative style of leadership. Financially, they have not fared well under his leadership either so there's a lot of self-interest at stake as well. At this point I should declare my own personal interest which stems from the fact that I present a political current affairs show called The Agenda for the Iranian-broadcaster Press TV which is owned by state-run television IRIB.. My other interest stems from the fact I’m quite a fan of Mahmoud Admadinejad who is adored by the common man and woman in Iran. Anyone who vows to narrow the gap between rich and poor can't be all that bad ... unless you're one of the rich! I have been to iran twice now, and as a visitor anywhere, if you want to find out what is really happening on the ground don’t speak to the intellectuals or the politicians ... get a translator and grab a taxi. Taxi drivers are a great source of information and they will give a more accurate view representing the man in the street - this is the man who can’t speak english and is therefore largely over-looked by lazy western journalists. So was the Iranian election a fraud? I can't say either way with any authority but neither can those coming from western democracies. We, of all people, have no right to throw stones at Iran’s elections. It is now well documented that the presidential elections which swept George W Bush to power the first time around were rigged, and there was a question mark over his second term. Sadly the complaint western media failed to expose this and indeed Fox News announced Bush was the newly-elected president without proof. I’m told that more20people in America voted for Pop Idol and America’s Got Talent TV shows than vote in the US presidential elections. True or not, they attracted vote rigging allegations as well. I have stood as a candidate in elections in Britain before, and if everyone who pledged me a vote did exactly that when it came to putting a cross on the ballot paper I would be sitting in the House of Commons by now. the fact is that voters do weird things when left to their own devices in a polling station, away from the glare of political pressure groups. In 1992 the media polls told Labour Leader Neil Kinnock he was going to win the 1992 General Election from the Tories - he didn’t. Ever since that shock result politicians have lost confidence in voters ... they simply can’t be trusted to do the ‘right’ thing. They’re unpredictable which is why the Conservatives are taking nothing for granted this time around. On a point of interest the '92 election was very close. Neil Kinnock lost by 1400 out of 25 milion votes - it came to represent 21 seats, a bitter pill for anyone. Proving election fraud in the face of an electronic system is difficult, but in Iran they used thumb prints and paper ballots in the astonishing 85 per cent turnout. The country’s Supreme Leader has now ordered an investigation into voter fraud, it should be easy enough to check. If a handful of men have spent the last few months stamping their thumbprints on millions of hoax papers, it should emerge quite soon. But the sad reality is the Mirhossein Mousavi losers will not accept they’ve lost and the winners will never relinquish their victory. At the end of the day will it make a great deal of difference? The reality is Ahmadinejad as president is not the most powerful person in Iran. He is not the commander in chief of the army or the security forces. He doesn't even have the power to go to war. Those powers are reserved for the supreme leader of Iran Ayatollah Khomeini and if Iranian people want more say in the running of their country perhaps it is to him they should go for reform inst ead of listening to siren calls from the self-serving West. * Yvonne Ridley has a weekly political show, The Agenda, which is broadcast on Press TV every Friday. She is also a founder of the RESPECT political party in England.
Friday, June 12, 2009
Salaamaleykum (0) commentsToday, the people of Iran will go to the polls and decide who their President will be for the next 4 years. ![]() While there are four contestants vying for the Presidential seat, lets focus on the famous 2. ![]() There is the current President, Ahmedinejad and the former Prime Minister, Mousavi. Ahmedinejad sure made his mark in the international arena. While he did became the arch- enemy of the Zionist-sympathetic West, he made alot of fans among the ordinary citizens of the Muslim world, and other anti-West/Zionist nations. As an observer from abroad, i can only say what i see and hear. I dont trust CNN or BBC...but i do trust al-Jazeera, and te words of Iranians in Iran. I called a friend in iran a few days back. He is in Esfahan...according to him, 70% of the citizens have gone to Mousavi. Apparently, while Ahmedinehjad's good with in rising the spirits of the zealous Muslim youths across the globe, he hasnt scored well in his own country. Realistic employment is low, economy's at its abyss, and oil prices have tripled during his Presidency. Well, I dont know much beyond that, but what I do know is what i expect of the President that will be elected. 1) Continue supporting and public show of unshakable support for the Palestianians. 2) Continue supporting Hezbollah. 3) Never to bow to either temptations or threats by the Zionists and her allies. 4) Continue the nuclear program. 5) Continue the ideals of the Islamic Revolution. Provided the above, I will be happy with whosoever is elected president. Allah Madad!
Friday, May 29, 2009
Spies, Lies, and Mr. Lebanon's Demise "There are agents, like Mahmoud Rafea, who confessed to have delivered bags with explosives. Other collaborators have confessed to have carried out field reconnaissance missions. Others have facilitated the entrance and exit of Israelis after accomplishing their missions. This is what is meant by executive agents. The door must be opened wide ... this Israeli path should be scrutinized so as to reach a place where we would find information about many crimes, particularly 2005 onwards." – Sayyid Hassan Nasrallah, commenting on the recent spate of Israeli spy arrests during a rally marking the ninth anniversary of the removal of Israeli troops from Lebanon, 22 May 2009. By Rannie Amiri Israel suffered two defeats in Lebanon, and both were by Hezbollah. The first occurred in May 2000 when Israeli troops were expelled (or withdrew, depending on which side of the border you are on) from southern Lebanon after a 22-year occupation. The second was the premeditated yet disastrous 34-day war waged in the summer of 2006. It may have succeeded in ravaging Lebanon but it certainly did not vanquish Hezbollah. They fought the mighty Israel Defense Forces to a draw, and in the minds of many this itself constituted victory. Israel has neither forgiven nor forgotten these losses. For them, the war against Lebanon and Hezbollah did not end in 2000 or in 2006 but continues today, albeit in different form. And events of the past several weeks revealed exactly what Israel has been up to. Spies There have always been Lebanese nationals acting as spies for Israel, but this should come as no surprise. They fought on their behalf for two decades after all, as members of the now-defunct South Lebanon Army during the occupation of the south. Although initially receiving little attention, a crackdown on these spy networks began late last year. Rapid advances in breaking them have evidently occurred, as dozens of suspects have been taken into custody since April. “If the Lebanese authorities say they have caught Israeli spies, there's a high likelihood that it's true,” said Shlomo Brom, former chief of strategic planning for the Israeli military. The Lebanese government is currently holding 30 suspects and has already charged 21 with spying for Israel in an ever-widening investigation. Those detained include an army colonel, a retired general, a deputy mayor, a truck driver and a mobile phone salesman, which two managed to escape across the border into Israel before being caught. Confiscated high-tech equipment and electronics used to transmit information to the Mossad were put on display by Lebanese Internal Security afterward. Because intelligence provided by certain agents may have led to increased destruction in the 2006 war (which killed 1,200 Lebanese, the vast majority civilians), Nasrallah demanded the death penalty be levied against those found to be complicit. As he declared in his speech on “Resistance and Liberation Day”: “I ask on your behalf and on behalf of the families of the martyrs and the wounded, on behalf of those whose homes were demolished and those who paid taxes to rebuild their infrastructure, Lies In the midst of unraveling and dismantling these espionage rings operating in Lebanon, a report penned by Erich Follath surfaced in the sensationalist, But does it have any merit? Not a single piece of credible evidence was presented to substantiate Follath’s claim. No sources were named, no documents were produced and the Special Tribunal for Lebanon charged with investigating the Hariri assassination denied ever coming to those conclusions (yet alone discussing them with Follath). “We don't know where the Der Spiegel magazine did get their information from and we don't know where they brought this story from. No one in the prosecutor's office has spoken to the German magazine about anything,” said the spokeswoman for the Tribunal. According to Nasrallah, “The Israelis and the Americans wondered how to scuttle the election and influence its outcome. Der Spiegel was their answer.” The case against Hezbollah is not only flimsy, but one likely fabricated by the author’s anonymous “sources.” It was discounted or simply ignored in Lebanon, even by Hezbollah’s opponents; Saad Hariri refused comment and Walid Jumblatt cautioned it may “derail justice.” Readers are referred to the trenchant reporting of Dr. Franklin Lamb who clearly exposed the gaping holes in, and unanswered questions of, Follath’s article. 'Mr. Lebanon' It is important to appreciate that the killing of “Mr. Lebanon” in February 2005 shook the country and ultimately led to the creation of the opposing March 8 and March 14 Alliances. It sharply divided Lebanese along sectarian lines and led to mutual recriminations and prolonged political paralysis. The confluence of the aforementioned events – discovering the extent of Israeli spy networks in Lebanon, followed by publication of the Der Spiegel article two weeks prior to crucial elections accusing Hezbollah of ordering the hit on Hariri – is no coincidence. So how do they relate to one another? Nasrallah stated it candidly: “The Israelis are acting preemptively before it is discovered that their spy networks were involved in assassinations in Lebanon.” Could it be that information fed from Israel to a friendly German periodical was done not just to foment Sunni-Shia tension prior to the June election or divert attention away from an imploding espionage ring, but to obfuscate Israel’s role in Hariri’s murder (which may be disclosed by their captured spies)? Unlike his son Saad today, Rafiq Hariri had good personal relations with Nasrallah and Hezbollah generally – facts Follath conveniently overlooked – making their participation in his murder especially unlikely. But, division and destabilization Should Israel be implicated in his death however, all of Lebanon’s political parties and confessional groups would unite against them in an instant. The cases of four pro-Syrian generals thought to be involved in the crime and held for four years without charge were recently dismissed by the Special Tribunal due to lack of evidence and recanted witness testimony. When it becomes clear the case against Hezbollah is likewise without merit and Israeli espionage rings operating in Lebanon are fully exposed, the Special Tribunal should waste no time in investigating Israel for its possible involvement in the assassination of Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri. - Rannie Amiri is an independent Middle East commentator.
Saturday, February 07, 2009
Decon If ackno ![]() By RANNI " Gaza is abuzz Human But even if all of Gaza’ Why? Becau Accep I submi Indee • Have we not recog • Have we not recog • Have the Samou • Has Khale |